Wednesday, October 22, 2008

time?

what do u mean by no time? fk u understand? yesterday and today no time? u come here and tell me u fking no time? u not interested isit? if u fking not interested then u blardy get out of this place!

- those were the times during training where 'no time' is a taboo word and can nvr be used as an excuse. I was an the receiving end of it when i produced a sub-standard piece of work.

that's besides the main point. there is 24hrs in a day and only so much u can do. THUS, instead of trying to "manage your time" to complete the $$%^& number of tasks. why not "manage your tasks" and complete them in a given set of time. As mentioned, there is only that much of things we can do. We shld manage our tasks, prioritise the more impt work and complete them within a certain time scale. The less impt work could either be thrown out of the window or jus micro manage them.

Instead of trying to complete all ur assignments and producing half fk results, we might as well pick out the most important assignment, focus our energy on it and produce a good work.

I believe bosses won't screw ppl for a slightly late but good assignment but they certainly would screw u for producing a fked up one.

The language is misleading: when someone has "no time", the disorder is not in his/her time but in his/her tasks. There are too many things: things that are too unimportant and too big that a person packs into that 24hrs. Simplification does not mean "saving time" but rather saving tasks". It's not a question of managing time. It's more about mangaing yourself.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home